March 13, 2009

Salon Notes: Getting It On (Getting On With It) After the MFA

On February 28, 2009, Aurelie Sheehan and Stephanie Balzar joined us to discuss Getting It On (Getting On With It) After the MFA: A Journey of Life and Aesthetics.

Aurelie Sheehan said that in her experience, the overlap between practicalities and aesthetics has yielded interesting and fruitful moments in her art. But she didn’t glorify the journey. She left her MFA program at City College with loads of debt. “I can’t even describe the pile of paper from student loans,” she said. “The deferments, the letters explaining why payments were late.” She took work as an adjunct instructor because she felt it important to keep her foot in the academic door, but the teaching didn’t pay enough to live on, and she had to take on temp work—“which was fun and everything”—to survive. She realized that the weird schedule and the juggling of jobs was “manipulating and deforming my life, and my writing was suffering from a lack of continuity.” As her credit card debt increased, Aurelie decided to take on full-time work as a secretary. “I remember buying the shoes and the dress—it was like a Halloween costume,” she said. “I sashayed into the office to convince them I had what it took to be a good secretary. And I did. Worst of all, I was a good secretary.” The job was simply something she did for money. She would write early in the morning before going into the office (she was writing a novella set in France and would listen to French radio while she worked which was her way of “traveling on the cheap”). In the end, Aurelie’s secretarial work became the creative impetus for her first novel, The Anxiety of Everyday Objects.

In addition to inspiring her own writing, Aurelie’s administrative skills led to jobs “semi-related to writing” at the Ucross Foundation in Wyoming, and the Folger Shakespeare Library in D.C. She taught part-time at Sheridan College and then at Johns Hopkins. Aurelie said, “All of these positions—teaching, Folger, Wyoming, secretarial work—prepared me for my current position in arts administration … There were some bleak months and years, working full-time, trying to find time to write on my lunch hour or before work.” But she found ways to discipline herself.

Stephanie Balzer, who earned her MFA at the University of Arizona in 2004 and is now the Executive Director of Voices, Inc. and the winner of the Mary Ann Campau Fellowship, has also sashayed into offices where people were convinced to hire her. After graduating from college in Flagstaff, Stephanie moved to Phoenix with the idea of getting a job in marketing. “So I ended up at The Business Journal thinking I’d buy their Book of Lists and a lady there offered me a temporary position answering phones. I thought this would buy me time.” Eight years later she was still at The Business Journal, but now as a business reporter on the legal beat, winning state and national journalism awards. Stephanie said it was gratifying to have essentially earned an “MBA on the streets” but said that her journalism career was challenging. “It was exhausting to care so much,” she said. She also realized that for years she had only been reading news. She applied for MFA programs.

When she began her MFA degree she felt behind her peers. She felt like she had no vocabulary in poetry, so she began a self-directed reading program. “I read fifty books in the summer between my first and second years,” she said. Although she began the program with the idea of becoming a professor, after teaching composition and introductory poetry to undergraduates she realized she “didn’t like it. I had a hard time really investing in students.” She also realized that while she enjoyed the fantasy of the academic life, she just wasn’t a scholar in the way that some of her peers were. Stephanie said, “After I graduated it took a year for me to get a job. I must have written 60 cover letters. I free-lanced to support myself, but mostly, I had a killer writing year. Nothing mattered. I cobbled stuff together to make it work.” Eventually she got a job as a communications officer for a local non-profit, which was practice for her current position as Executive Director of the non-profit Voices, Inc., which serves low-income, at-risk youth through the teaching and creation of documentary arts. “It is my first authentic job,” she said, “pulling together my reporting self, my non-profit desire, my creative writing self.”

Although both writers have come into their own professionally and artistically, Aurelie admitted to “many lonely moments as a writer, staring out of the window, wondering, is anyone out there?” She also said that through the MFA, she came to realize that she was “not crazy for wanting to write, for having that impulse. We, in the MFA, were collectively crazy. It gave me the strength and stupidity to do the sending out.” She described “this internal journey” of looking at years’ worth of work and noting patterns. “What was with all the green and the small animals?” she laughed. During the 10 years between her first short story collection and her first novel, Aurelie wrote two novellas that didn’t sell, and then realized she was “the captive of certain things in my subconscious—a type of relationship, an image.” She decided to approach these things directly instead of metaphorically, and she wrote a collection of “intensely personal, non-fiction essays, the stories of my life.” She used a variety of forms, finding that as she wrote “the form would emerge intuitively.” She wrote about things she was “ashamed of, afraid of” until she felt liberated and emptied out. She spent the next five years working on her first novel, which was much harder than she’d imagined. “I’m not a natural novelist,” she said. Still, she embarked on her second novel, History Lesson for Girls, “trying to write what mattered.” The novel is about “teenage girls who felt small in the eyes of the world and I had the feeling of rescuing these two teenage girls from oblivion, and I was passionate about it.” Aurelie continued to write stories, and also book reviews, which she said allowed her “to be part of the conversation” even during the years when she wasn’t publishing.

Of her own aesthetic journey Stephanie said, “Poems were not a refuge for me. I was drawn to poetry because it’s short!” Even now, she said, she is somewhat embarrassed to be a poet. “I tell people I’m a writer, not a poet,” she said. She has tried to write in other forms. She tried to write essays, “but they were too short so I turned them into prose poems.” She tried to write plays but “I’m terrible at plot. In the first draft, nothing happened! Then, in the second draft, too much happened, and everyone thought it was parody.” Stephanie said, “I rarely send out my poetry. I am a very slow writer. I give myself projects – books that have a dramatic arc, prose poems that are all connected. It takes years though.” Winning the Campau Fellowship and “headlining” at a reading has been affirming, but it is still hard to “slough off the cultural weirdness attached to the ‘poet’ title.” Stephanie has kept her art alive by relying on a small group of writers and readers, by “blog-skulking,” and by giving herself permission to drop the pressure of being an academic. Her biggest fear is “being a hobbyist poet—there’s nothing worse.”

When asked about patterns of discipline in keeping their craft alive, Aurelie said that “my writing time has adapted to fit my working life and my family life.” While working at the law firm, she wrote early on weekday mornings, and played on the weekends. At Folger, she wrote during her lunch hour (which meant that she wrote very short scenes—scenes that could be written in 45 minutes). When she became a mom, she “just had to become really concentrated with my time. I knew I couldn’t fool around; I had to get down to business. I have to do it or I get crazy.”

Stephanie said she uses the same computer for work and for personal stuff, “so I always have my poems with me. I can edit while I’m at work, in short spurts, but I can’t write like that.” Stephanie described herself as a sprinter—she takes months off, and then pushes. “I am not a routine person,” she said. “I go to work at different times every day, get home at different time, so I don’t really structure myself like that. I am not a creature of routine.” Living alone, she has the luxury of taking time when she wants it. Taking time to write in the evenings is a treat. “Whenever it happens, it happens,” she said.

By way of closing, Aurelie said, “The day you graduate will be just like the day before. You’ll be a writer no matter whether you are working at Starbucks or wearing a suit.” She joked that “colorful scarves are important.” She said sometimes you’ll think, “What kind of cosmic joke is this?” But if you “keep sashaying it happens.” In other words, “uncertainty and determination live hand in hand the whole time.” Stephanie added, “Why write unless you have to?” She called her writing path “a manifestation of faith. I kept doing these crazy, directionless things because that’s the only way I know how to live.”

November 25, 2008

Salon Notes: On Beauty

On Saturday, Nov. 15th, we ate enchiladas (courtesy of PR Griffis) and talked to Richard Siken and Manuel Muñoz about their thoughts on beauty.

Richard Siken started off the evening, asking us to think of beauty in terms of “units.”  For the prose writer and the poet, there are sentences and lines, words, paragraphs, essays, stories, poems. “I’m not sure morphemes and phonemes are where beauty is meant to accumulate,” he said, giving us a limit. Somewhere between sentences and sounds, beauty exists. 

He talked about how poets play with the friction between sentences and lines, but how others, like Gertrude Stein, insist “emotion only happens in a paragraph” where you have sentences pitted against sentences. Richard acknowledged: “the fact that beauty can come in units is weird,” wishing that there was a way to measure such things. “But,” he said, “it’s not the metric system.”

Here, Manuel Muñoz picked up, agreeing. When working on his first book, he said, “I forgot about character, I forgot about forward movement, I sometimes forgot about plot.”  What he focused on were sounds, sentences, and beautiful language. One unit of beauty took precedence over others – sound and language dominated. Not that that was wrong, or his new focus on character is right. It’s about consciousness, and style, and knowing where your style is coming from.

To elaborate, Richard talked about massage artists.  He noted one technique they have is to imagine their wrists as dead, as if their hands were separate from their bodies.  Sculptors do the opposite. Their wrists are low filters, direct channels into their arms, their heads, their hearts. Both Richard and Manuel agreed: we are grander than just writers – as artists, we’re working with representation. In Richard’s words, “the world is being filtered through us.”  We have to watch how high our filters are, because “somehow, I have to get it out of my head and into your head. It’s not just whether it’s beautiful or not; it’s how it’s packaged.”

Beauty seems absolute, yet while we tend to agree on what is not beautiful, there’s no consensus on what is beautiful. What do our professors consider beautiful?  Manuel’s first memory of this came from watching his grandmother put on knee-high stockings. He saw a scar from a black widow bite she got on a trip to the outhouse, and felt for the first time the danger and her mortality. Richard’s grandmother, a stroke victim, would try to crack eggs with the half of her body that wasn’t properly coordinated. He still remembers eggs slammed on the countertop. Their grandmothers were gorgeous and memorable; for Manuel, it was proximity; for Richard, it was the breaking of social mores. 

Proximity happened to be one of Richard’s favorite words (along with cleave, braniac, and pistachio).  It turned his memory to waiting tables at The Cup, where he had to say “behind” as a signal to his co-workers, constantly touching them on the back.  The wait staff developed the illusion of closeness because of this physical proximity, but spending time together outside of work, realized they had little or nothing to say to one another. Still, in that proximity, that closeness, there was beauty.

“We all know, for ourselves, what beauty is,” said Manuel.  “What I always found beautiful was loneliness and darkness – the austere. I write about Chicanos in the Central Valley – that’s not beautiful.”  Richard was on the same page, since he celebrated conquistadores in his work – with all their genocide and trampling, he said, “they’re really shiny.”  And he’s right.  Conquistadores are really shiny.

Ugly and beautiful are not opposites. Ugly is exciting for many authors, and ugly beauty is “highly vested,” said Richard. He argued, “there are a lot of things you don’t want to put words around. If you don’t believe in the sacred, sit down and make a list of all the things you won’t write about and you’ll realize you believe in the sacred.” He went on to argue that people want two things, to belong and not to be left behind.  If we, as writers, can make sense of either of those two, people will listen to us and find it beautiful.  But if we pretend that something is beautiful when we don’t think it is, our readers will be able to tell.

Authenticity is hard to come by, and sometimes comes about through odd means.  For a long time, Manuel did not write stories with people’s names in them.  He had gotten the reaction too many times – “Who the fuck is Ancelmo?”  He resorted to pronouns and realized “the woman next door” was much closer to Chicano reality than naming names all the time. It put the woman in relation to others and created an interconnectedness that came closer to what he was trying to express. At this point Richard changed his mind from what he started with.  “Beauty doesn’t come in units.  Maybe beauty happens within connections, but not in things.”

When asked for closing remarks, Richard warned us about process and the dangers of creating beauty. ”Somehow you have to take the world in and let it out.  Generate your text.  It’s much easier to revise towards beauty.  If you end up creating beauty, people will hold you to it.  They will celebrate you or get aggressive; they may not allow you to change.”  His advice:  “Stay as liquid as you can and as centered as you can.”

 

PS NOTES

Manuel suggests reading, as a work of beauty, Mary Gaitskill’s Veronica, even though half the people he recommends it to end up hating it

November 2, 2008

Art and the Craft

Join us, Saturday, November 15th at 6PM at 3249 E Hawthorne St. for the second Salon of the season. 

Manuel Munoz and Richard Siken will be there to discuss one of the more ineffable elements of being an artist: how to create beauty and meaning on a regular basis.

This Salon will focus on the sentence, phrase, and word level to consider more fully how language works, and how we as artists can make our words more beautiful and powerful in service of a piece as a whole.

October 13, 2008

Salon Notes: Keeping the Dream Alive

If you missed the first Salon of the semester, no worries, Salon Notes is here to fill you in. 

Alison Hawthorne Deming admitted to us, “My life as a writer has been very strange.”  Her family, descended from Nathaniel Hawthorne, is chock full of well-to-do writers and intellectuals.  As a teenager, she strayed. After two months at college, she dropped out and began a picaresque life:  a shotgun wedding, flight with her two-year old daughter to Vermont, work as a dishwasher, a welfare mom, then as a sex educator and program manager for Planned Parenthood.  This last job lasted her 14 years; she was writing all the while.

After completing the MFA program at Goddard, she received the Fine Arts Work Center fellowship in Provincetown, Massachusetts, which supported (and still supports) early-career writers.

“Having a year of freedom,” she told us, “has a profound effect on your imagination as a writer.” She published her first book in her mid-40s, after a steady career in public health.  “Without fellowships, I don’t think I would have been able to do it.”

When Shannon Cain, fiction editor at KORE press, heard the news, she broke out into a cold sweat and began jumping around her house.  She won the National Endowment for the Arts grant. “Everything changed after that,” she said, “agents came out of the woodwork…I interviewed them all, very New York, very caffeinated.”  After three interviews, she picked the agent who treated her stories as works in progress, and avoided agents who were eager to send her babies into the world too soon.

They both confessed that there’s no secret on how to win fellowships.  The competition for most of them is top-notch, and Shannon reminded us, we’re up against the cream of the crop.  Having both worked as judges, they told us about a quarter of the manuscripts are at that level: good.  From there, it gets very, very difficult to narrow down the winners.  For the NEA grant in particular, 1000 manuscripts are read; 20 are chosen.  Alison chimed in—it matters what you put on page one, because “when you’re on the jury, your mind goes numb.” They both agreed, “It all comes back to the work.”

There are tales of cronyism about these things, but for the most prestigious fellowships, Alison said, “It’s not like it’s a cabal,” and Shannon gave us some insight, “We’re all under microscopes.  For the judges, integrity is important.  We’re hypervigilant about our ethics.”

And they were both quick to temper the value of fellowships.  Shannon told us, “There’s always something tricky about measuring success…it does a lot for your self-esteem to win a fellowship…it doesn’t mean success, it means you found your audience.”  Alison was blunt, saying “I won’t lie about recognition or success. I love it. On the other hand, you can’t be living for that. You will never get enough.”

Even when you get a fellowship, it’s easy to freak out about how much time you suddenly have on your hands to write. Shannon would accept those moments when she found herself doing nothing with her day but “sit in the shed, fiddle-fart around. I would feel crappy until I finally realized this was my pattern.” Goal-setting worked for her, so she would aim to write 1,000 words each day. Alison had a more physical approach, “I have two necessary distractions. I go out and get my hands dirty [by gardening], or I play the piano.” Working with her hands in a way that avoided writing would refresh her to write some more.

Despite success, their biographies admitted something writers are loathe to consider, that any list of successes is followed by an exponentially longer list of failures.  Alison didn’t start publishing until (what we would consider) “late” in her career.  Shannon submitted 240 stories for publication in the last four years. Only six of them were published. She summed it up by saying, “I’ve been rejected everywhere.” They both noted that for women in particular, it is difficult to “be firm with your children and your loved ones [about your need to write].” There’s always something working against writers; they strongly suggested we surround ourselves with family and friends who are sympathetic to our need to write.

The benefits of a fellowship are clear, said Alison, “to pull yourself out of the velocity and distraction of a sort of culturally-enforced ADD life.” She then mentioned some extreme fellowships – the National Science Foundation’s grant that sends writers to Antarctica for five months; a fellowship in Oregon that requires you being comfortable with a chainsaw.

If that’s not your thing, then still, she said, “I don’t think there’s any better gift you can give to yourself than that freedom and time to write.” Alison ended her story by telling us, “I’ve sold houses to be able to have another year to write.” The stock market is troubled and we may not have houses to sell, but Shannon shared some positive news:  a friend of hers, a fiction writer, signed a two-book contract with Random House last week, on the day the Dow sank 700 points.

For a smattering of fellowship and residency options, check our pages here. For a more comprehensive list, Alison recommends The PEN Guide to Grants and Awards for American Writers, AWP’s Grant Listing, and Poets and Writers Grants and Awards page, all linked below.

PEN Guide to Grants and Awards for American Writers

http://www.pen.org/page.php/prmID/1763

AWP’s Grant Listing

http://www.awpwriter.org/contests/index.htm 

Poets and Writers Grants and Awards Page

http://www.pw.org/grants?apage=*&

 

Quick contest plug: KORE Press has a fiction short story chapbook competition coming up. The deadline is October 31st.

http://www.korepress.org/KorePressShortFictionAward.htm

October 12, 2008

Thanks for Coming!

The first Salon of the season was a resounding success. Thanks so much to Alison Hawthorne Deming and Shannon Cain for their time and insight. And thanks everybody for coming. Josh will be posting a rundown of the event later this week.

Also, look for an announcement of our next Salon, The Art of the Sentence, with Manuel Munoz and Richard Siken. We’re shooting for mid-November.

September 22, 2008

Keeping the Dream Alive

The first Salon of the year will be on:

Saturday, October 11th at 11AM at 3249 E Hawthorne St., (home of Salon co-coordinator, Mr. Josh (Johnny Orchid) Garcia.)

Join us for the first Salon of the year with former Stegner Fellow and Provincetown Fine Arts Center Resident, Alison Hawthorne Deming, and Shannon Cain, executive director of KORE Press and National Endowment for the Arts Grant recipient.

The Salon will focus on Fellowships, Grant Writing, and Post MFA life. There will be food.

 

Shannon Cain’s fiction has appeared most recently in Tin House, The Massachusetts Review, and the New England Review. She received a Pushcart Prize in 2009, an O’Henry Prize in 2008, and a fellowship from the National Endowment for the Arts in 2006.

She is the executive director of Kore Press, an independent publisher of literature by women. She has taught fiction at the University of Arizona and currently teaches both at the Gotham Writers’ Workshop and as a private coach. She is a designated Teaching Artist on the Arizona Commission for the Arts Roster.

Shannon has received scholarships from the Sewanee Writers’ Conference, the Tin House Summer Workshop, and the Bread Loaf Writers’ Conference. She has been an artist-in-residence at the Virginia Center for the Creative Arts and the Ragdale Foundation.

Alison Hawthorne Deming is the author of three books of poetry and three books of nonfiction. Shereceived an MFA from Vermont College (1983) and held a Wallace Stegner Fellowship at Stanford University (1987-88). Her writing has won two fellowships from the National Endowment for the Arts (1990 and 1995), fellowships from the Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown (1984-85), the Arizona Commission on the Arts, and the Tucson/Pima Arts Council, a Residency Award from the National Writer’s Voice Project, the Pablo Neruda Prize from Nimrod, Pushcart Prize, the Gertrude B. Claytor Award from the Poetry Society of America, and the Bayer Award in science writing from Creative Nonfiction.

She has held residencies at Yaddo, Cummington Community for the Arts, the Djerassi Foundation, Mesa Refuge, The Sitka Center for Art and Ecology, The Island Institute in Sitka, Alaska, Hawthornden Castle International Retreat for Writers in Scotland, and the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.

She has served on the faculty of Prague Summer Seminars, Writers at Work, Taos Summer Writers’ Conference, Art of the Wild, The Orion Society’s Forgotten Language Tour, the Sitka Symposium on Human Values and the Written Word, and numerous other writing programs. In 1997 she was Distinguished Visiting Writer at the University of Hawai’i in Mānoa.